<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>FDAF on Mi&amp;Bee Blog</title><link>/en/tags/fdaf/</link><description>Recent content in FDAF on Mi&amp;Bee Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>蓝宝石的傻话</managingEditor><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/en/tags/fdaf/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Variable Step Size and Frequency-Domain Adaptive Algorithms</title><link>/en/posts/physical-world/variable-step-frequency-domain/</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>/en/posts/physical-world/variable-step-frequency-domain/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-convergence-trade-off-of-fixed-step-size"&gt;The Convergence Trade-off of Fixed Step Size&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Standard LMS and NLMS algorithms use a fixed step size parameter $\mu$. The choice of step size directly impacts algorithm performance, but a fundamental contradiction exists:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Large step size&lt;/strong&gt;: Fast convergence and quick adaptation to environmental changes, but large steady-state error and low filtering precision&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Small step size&lt;/strong&gt;: Small steady-state error and high filtering precision, but slow convergence and sluggish response to abrupt changes&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This contradiction is particularly pronounced in applications such as echo cancellation and active noise control — the system needs fast convergence during startup, yet wishes to maintain low error in steady state. A fixed step size cannot satisfy both phases simultaneously.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>