<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>PCIe on Mi&amp;Bee Blog</title><link>https://blog.mickeyzzc.tech/en/tags/pcie/</link><description>Recent content in PCIe on Mi&amp;Bee Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><managingEditor>蓝宝石的傻话</managingEditor><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.mickeyzzc.tech/en/tags/pcie/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>SSD Selection — Controller, NAND, and Product Tier, Understanding Tech Beats Memorizing Models</title><link>https://blog.mickeyzzc.tech/en/posts/iot/ssd-selection-guide/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://blog.mickeyzzc.tech/en/posts/iot/ssd-selection-guide/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="about-this-handbook"&gt;About This Handbook&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This handbook is organized by &lt;strong&gt;technology dimension&lt;/strong&gt;, not by brand model. The reasoning is practical: SSD models refresh every six months, and listing them one by one is both verbose and reads like brand endorsement — once the vendor updates, the article loses value. But SSD underlying technology — controller vendor landscape, NAND generations, TLC/QLC slowdown behavior, DRAM vs HMB schemes, the real payoff of PCIe generations — these dimensions stay stable for 2–3 years. Understand the technology dimensions, and you can judge any SSD on the market, rather than memorizing specific models.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>